Globalteckz

The Most Expensive Lie in ERP Implementation

  • Home
  • The Most Expensive Lie in ERP Implementation
The Most Expensive Lie in ERP Implementation

The Most Expensive Lie in ERP Implementation

ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) systems are meant to streamline operations, unify data, and empower decision-making. Yet, in boardrooms and project kick-off meetings, there’s one phrase that silently sabotages even the best ERP initiatives.

It sounds harmless. It’s said with confidence. But it costs organizations millions in wasted resources, delayed go-lives, and lost trust.

“We’ll fix it later.”

That’s the most expensive lie in ERP implementation.

   

How the Lie Begins

Every ERP project starts with optimism. The leadership team invests in technology to simplify processes, improve visibility, and drive growth. But as the implementation progresses, deadlines tighten, requirements evolve, and budgets stretch.

Then someone says,

“Let’s go live first. We’ll fix it later.”

It might be about incomplete data migration, missing workflows, or half-tested modules. On the surface, it’s a temporary compromise — but in reality, it’s a strategic time bomb.

Why “Fix It Later” Becomes So Costly

ERP systems integrate everything — Finance, Supply Chain, HR, procurement, Inventory, and analytics. When one part is rushed or ignored, the ripple effect is enormous.

a. Data Migration Neglected

When legacy data is moved without cleansing or validation, duplicate and inconsistent records corrupt the new system.

  • Vendors get paid twice.
  • Inventory reports misfire.
  • Financial audits fail.

Fixing bad data post-go-live can cost 5–10 times more than cleaning it upfront.

b. Process Mapping Skipped

Many teams configure ERP modules based on assumptions rather than documented business processes.

The result?

Departments struggle with workflows that don’t reflect reality. Employees create manual workarounds, defeating the purpose of automation.

Reconfiguring these workflows later means unlearning old habits, retraining users, and rewriting integrations — a triple hit on time, cost, and morale.

c. Testing Shortcuts

To save time, organizations often skip complete User Acceptance Testing (UAT) or integration testing. The immediate effect seems small. The long-term effect is chaos:

  • Invoices post to wrong accounts
  • Reports show mismatched numbers
  • APIs fail during peak hours

A single critical bug post-go-live can halt operations and cost thousands per hour in downtime.

d. Ignoring Change Management

Another “we’ll handle it later” moment happens when training and communication are deprioritized.

Employees, unprepared for the new system, revert to spreadsheets, creating shadow processes outside the ERP.

This isn’t just inefficiency — it’s data fragmentation, one of the leading reasons ERP projects fail to deliver promised ROI.

e. Underestimating Post-Go-Live Support

When go-live happens without a dedicated stabilization phase, minor issues snowball into business disruptions.

By the time management realizes the damage, costs escalate into emergency consulting fees, overtime pay, and frustrated users — all preventable with early planning.

Check out – Points to remember during ERP support and Maintenance Phase

The Real Price Tag of “We’ll Fix It Later”

According to Panorama Consulting’s ERP Report, over 50% of ERP projects exceed their original budgets, primarily due to rework and poor change management.

Every deferred task compounds cost:

Area Ignored Immediate Impact Long-Term Cost Multiplier
Data cleansing Minor inconsistencies 8–10× cost in corrections
UAT skipped Faster go-live 6× cost in bug fixes
Incomplete process mapping Temporary workaround 5× cost in reconfiguration
Training deferred Faster rollout 4× cost in retraining and resistance
Change management ignored Time saved in short term Cultural resistance, loss of adoption

These numbers are not just theoretical — they’re reflected in billions of dollars of global ERP project overruns every year.

Why Organizations Fall for This Lie

a. Deadline Pressure

Executives want quick wins. Go-live dates become more symbolic than strategic, pushing teams to cut corners.

b. Misaligned Priorities

Stakeholders often underestimate the complexity of integrating processes across finance, HR, procurement, and logistics.

c. Communication Gaps

Technical teams speak in configurations; business users speak in workflows. Without a strong Business Analyst or ERP Project Manager, misinterpretations creep in.

d. Fear of Escalation

Teams hesitate to report risks, thinking they can be patched post-launch — until those risks turn into failures.

What “Fix It Now” Looks Like

The alternative to “fix it later” is a culture of early accountability and structured governance.

a. Define Non-Negotiables

Before project kickoff, identify what must be completed before go-live — data validation, critical workflows, and compliance checkpoints.

b. Empower the Business Analyst

A strong BA ensures that requirements are captured, tested, and approved early. They prevent last-minute assumptions that lead to costly fixes later.

c. Invest in Testing and Training

Budget at least 20–25% of total ERP effort for user testing, scenario simulation, and hands-on training. This reduces post-go-live confusion by over 60%.

d. Adopt a Phased Rollout

Instead of forcing a full go-live, phase implementations module by module. This approach allows testing, feedback, and improvement cycles — the hallmark of sustainable ERP success.

e. Create a Stabilization Plan

Every ERP project should include a 30–90 day stabilization phase post-go-live for issue resolution and user support. This prevents emergency escalation later.

The Hidden Cost Beyond Money

The most expensive lie doesn’t just drain budgets — it damages trust.

When employees lose faith in the system, adoption drops, data accuracy suffers, and management stops relying on ERP reports for decision-making.

An ERP that isn’t trusted becomes a glorified database — not the transformation tool it was meant to be.

Real-World Example

A mid-sized manufacturing firm fast-tracked its ERP deployment to meet fiscal year deadlines. Data cleansing was incomplete, and training was minimal.

After complete understanding of existing system within weeks of go-live:

  • Inventory mismatches caused shipment delays
  • No proper entries as trained to the employee.
  • Vendors received duplicate payments
  • Financial reports were unreliable due to improper data entries. – As users feels ERP system will do everything. 
  • Unwanted new customizations coming from Users level.

The company had to hire external consultants to “fix it later.” The rework cost nearly 40% of the original ERP budget, wiping out the expected ROI.

If they had spent an additional 10% upfront on proper testing and training, the losses could have been avoided entirely.

How to Protect Your ERP Investment

  1. Never compromise on data quality.
  2. Document and validate every process.
  3. Empower Business Analysts and Subject Matter Experts.
  4. Implement strong project governance and risk tracking.
  5. Invest in training before, during, and after go-live.
  6. Treat post-go-live stabilization as part of the project — not an afterthought.

ERP success is built not on speed, but on discipline, transparency, and accountability.

conclusion

Conclusion

The phrase “We’ll fix it later” might save a meeting today, but it can sink an ERP tomorrow.

ERP implementation isn’t just a technology project — it’s a transformation journey. Every shortcut taken in requirements, testing, or training silently multiplies future cost and complexity.

The truth is simple: what you delay now will cost you exponentially later.
And in ERP, that’s not just expensive — it’s unforgiving.

Leave Comment

×